Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. provided the essential to receive the credit right acquired in a competitive process carried out in the context of the judicial reorganization process. As a result, after the definition of the operation strategy towards the Federal Court, the client was successful in receiving all of his credit.

Amount received R$ 200.000.000,00

Amount received

 R$ 200.000.000,00

(the goal to be achieved) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 200.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 200.000.000,00 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund.

The client requested that the neolaw. to carry out the acquisition of credit rights in a judicial auction, carried out as part of a judicial reorganization process, observing the stalking horse model. The customer was the winner in the competitive process.

Amount received R$ 820.358,08

Amount received

 R$ 820.358,08

(credit received in totality)

Credit amount involved
R$ 820.358,08

Customer’s expectation
R$ 410.000,00

We represent a beverage company
The client requested that the neolaw. provide what is necessary to collect his credit. In order to avoid expenses with the initiation of legal proceedings, at first, we decided to send an extrajudicial notification to the debtor. Due to the notification received, the debtor contacted us, which, after some negotiations, allowed the formalization of an agreement, that made it possible to fully satisfy our client’s credit.

Amount received R$ 14.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 14.000.000,00

(aim reached)

Credit amount involved
R$ 365.723.639,04

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 50.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 40,000,000.00 (aim reached)

We represent a credit rights investment fund. About 10 years after filing the lawsuit, when the neolaw. started to sponsor the case, we were successful in holding a company responsible for assets, based on the recognition of the economic group setting with the original debtor.

With the equity responsibility of the new company, it was possible to pledge a property owned by it, located in the city of Manaus – AM, whose market value is around R$ 14,000,000.00. The process will continue to seek expropriation of other properties from the debtors.

Amount received R$ 1.600.040,00

Amount received

R$ 1.600.040,00

 (aim reached)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 30.116.657,47

Customer’s expectation
 R$ 1.000.000,00

We represent a credit rights investment fund. The lawsuit was distributed in 1997, and no assets owned were found. Given the aspects of no goods, the client had no expectation of receipt in the process.

After the neolaw. having assumed the case, we requested the breach of the bank secrecy of the executed company and identified the receipt of “dividends” (equity interest) from another company. We ask for the attachment of all receivables that the debtor would be entitled to, which was granted by the judge in our case. With the execution of the pledge, we contacted the defendant and started to seek an agreement.

We signed an agreement in September 2017, whereby our client received R$ 1,600,040.00, of which      R$ 1,180,040.00 in cash and R$ 420,000.00 in real estate.

Amount received R$ 4.298.193,82

Amount received

 R$ 4.298.193,82.

 (the goal to be achieved)

Credit amount involved
 R$ 49.883.169,57

Amount received
 R$ 5.000.000,00

Prospects of receiving an additional R$ 26,000,000.00 (the goal to be achieved)
We sponsor 3 (three) Execution Actions to the detriment of a certain group of companies, filed between 1997 and 1999. After decades of executive procedures, all judicial research, repeated over the years, remained unsuccessful, preventing the creditor receive the values.
After the neolaw. initiate action in the case, the extrajudicial investigations carried out accused that, in reality, the executed are part of a large economic group, in the middle of which, a certain company has significant assets (approximately R$ 200,000,000.00), through a precatory, to be paid in installments, until the year 2024.
In view of this situation, we filed a Legal Personality Disregard Incident, aiming at including the company in the liability category, as well as the preliminary seizure of the amounts arising from the precatory to be received.
After much dispute, the court recognized the forfeiture of R$ 26,000,000.00.
The customer has already received R $ 4,298,193.82.

Amount received R$ 10.000.000,00

Amount received

R$ 10.000.000,00

(meta (aim reached))

Credit amount involved
R$ 18.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 5.000.000,00

We represent a financial credit securitizer.
Action filed on April 25th, 1996, in the face of the company and the guarantor partner. When the neolaw. started to sponsor the process, we request access to the debtor’s Income Statements, and it is possible to verify that, in 2007, the executed was the owner of a great artistic collection, composed by 29 works of art, of renowned painters, among them Alfredo Volpi , Milton da Costa, Genaro de Carvalho, Meric Marcier, Chico Caruso, Lasar Segal, Emiliano Di Cavalcanti, in addition to collections of Chinese paintings from the Quing Dynasty and a set of Japanese porcelains, whose combined values ​​amounted to more than 10 million reais . We were able to verify that, after being cited in our process, the executor held public auctions of his entire artistic collection, through an art gallery. All works were sold at the auction, to different buyers. We based ourselves on the argument that all purchasers would be able to find out about our debtor’s insolvency status, which was a notorious fact, including being reported by newspapers in the city of Rio de Janeiro at the time. The responsible judge accepted our argument, recognizing the fraud in the execution of the sale of the entire Debtor’s artistic collection. With the recognition of execution fraud, the masterpieces belonged to our client.

Amount received R$ 27.654.756,36

Amount received

 R$ 27.654.756,36

(credit received in totality) 

 

Credit amount involved
R$ 31.252.085,26

Customer’s expectation
R$ 27.002.085,26 

We represent a Credit Rights Investment Fund and it is a case of a precatory transaction.
The client requested that the neolaw. provide the necessary to receive the acquired credit right, before the Federal Court of the Judicial Section of the Federal District. After the establishment of a debate on the ownership of credit rights, without any interest on the part of the Federal Union, it was determined that its solution should take place before the common justice. Therewith, the new process was initiated before a Civil Tribunal of the Central Court of the Capital of Sao Paulo, after a complex debate, the client was the winner in the first instance (favorable judgement), having before the judgment appeal of filed by the opposing party, opted to enter into an agreement with it, the sole intention of expediting receipt.

Amount received R$ 42.237.179,3

Amount received

 R$ 42.237.179,3

(credit received in totality) 

Credit amount involved
R$ 40.000.000,00

Customer’s expectation
R$ 42.237.179,31